Current reports

After the court approved the concluded settlement agreement, civil case No. e2-3095-880/2025 was terminated. Public institution “VILNIAUS ARKIVYSKUPIJOS EKONOMO TARNYBA” filed a lawsuit against AB “INTER RAO Lietuva”, demanding EUR 172,247.11 in compensation for the price difference, which, according to the VILNIAUS ARKIVYSKUPIJOS EKONOMO TARNYBA, was due to it because AB “INTER RAO Lietuva” stopped supplying electricity in May 2022. AB “INTER RAO Lietuva” filed an objection to the lawsuit and the Parties agreed to resolve the dispute by settlement agreement. Vilnius Regional Court on November 19, 2025 approved the settlement agreement between the Public institution “VILNIAUS ARKIVYSKUPIJOS EKONOMO TARNYBA”  and AB “INTER RAO Lietuva”, according to which both Parties confirm that The Parties have no and will not have any claims against each other under the Electricity Purchase and Sale Agreement according concluded between them of November 8, 2013 (including all annexes, amendments and supplements) (hereinafter referred to as the Agreement) and that they waive all and any claims arising from or related to this Agreement.

Final decision in civil case No. e2A-199-854/2025. In this case, Orion Global Pet, UAB filed a lawsuit against AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“, demanding compensation for losses in the amount of EUR 207,356.27, which, according to Orion Global Pet, UAB, were incurred when AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“ stopped supplying electricity in May 2022. The court of first instance dismissed Orion Global Pet, UAB’s claim in its decision of 17 December 2024. Orion Global Pet, UAB appealed the decision of the court of first instance, but the Lithuanian Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal in its ruling of 27 May 2025 and left the decision unchanged.

The decision of the Legislator in civil case No. e2A-75-467/2025. Company ROQUETTE AMILINA  filed a claim against AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“, demanding compensation for losses of EUR 6,113,348.33, which, according to ROQUETTE AMILINA , arose when Inter Rao Lietuva, AB stopped supplying electricity in May 2022. In this case, Inter Rao Lietuva, AB filed a counterclaim, demanding that ROQUETTE AMILINA be awarded a debt of EUR 1,170,021.60, EUR 43,056.79 in default interest, as well as 12.5 percent. procedural interest. By the decision of the Court of First Instance of 2024-09-30, the claim of ROQUETTE AMILINA was dismissed, and the counterclaim of Inter Rao Lietuva, AB was partially satisfied. After ROQUETTE AMILINA  and Inter Rao Lietuva, AB appealed the decision of the court of first instance, the Lithuanian Court of Appeal, by its ruling of 27 March 2025, rejected the appeal of ROQUETTE AMILINA and satisfied the appeal of Inter Rao Lietuva, AB. Thus, the claim of ROQUETTE AMILINA, AB was rejected, and Inter Rao Lietuva, AB was satisfied. ROQUETTE AMILINA  filed a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court of Lithuania, the court refused to accept the appeal and thus finally resolved the case in favor of AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“. ROQUETTE AMILINA paid all amounts of money awarded in favor of AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“.

The final decision in civil case No. e2A-39-881/2025 has entered into force. AB „ORLEN Lietuva“ had filed a claim against AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“, demanding compensation for losses of EUR 8,388,760.65, which, according to AB „ORLEN Lietuva“, were incurred by AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“, due to the cessation of electricity supply in May 2022. By the decision of the Court of First Instance of 2024-07-10, AB „ORLEN Lietuva“ claim was dismissed. After AB „ORLEN Lietuva“ appealed the decision of the Court of First Instance, the Court of Appeal of Lithuania dismissed the appeal by its ruling of 2025-03-12 and left the decision unchanged. AB „ORLEN Lietuva“ filed a cassation appeal with the Supreme Court of Lithuania. By its ruling of 2025-07-01, the Court of Cassation refused to accept the appeal and thus finally resolved the case in favor of AB „INTER RAO Lietuva“.